Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57
Filter
1.
Compr Psychiatry ; 132: 152467, 2024 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A RCT of a novel intervention to detect antidepressant medication response (the PReDicT Test) took place in five European countries, accompanied by a nested study of its acceptability and implementation presented here. The RCT results indicated no effect of the intervention on depression at 8 weeks (primary outcome), although effects on anxiety at 8 weeks and functioning at 24 weeks were found. METHODS: The nested study used mixed methods. The aim was to explore patient experiences of the Test including acceptability and implementation, to inform its use within care. A bespoke survey was completed by trial participants in five countries (n = 778) at week 8. Semi-structured interviews were carried out in two countries soon after week 8 (UK n = 22, Germany n = 20). Quantitative data was analysed descriptively; for qualitative data, thematic analysis was carried out using a framework approach. Results of the two datasets were interrogated together. OUTCOMES: Survey results showed the intervention was well received, with a majority of participants indicating they would use it again, and it gave them helpful extra information; a small minority indicated the Test made them feel worse. Qualitative data showed the Test had unexpected properties, including: instigating a process of reflection, giving participants feedback on progress and new understanding about their illness, and making participants feel supported and more engaged in treatment. INTERPRETATION: The qualitative and quantitative results are generally consistent. The Test's unexpected properties may explain why the RCT showed little effect, as properties were experienced across both trial arms. Beyond the RCT, the qualitative data sheds light on measurement reactivity, i.e., how measurements of depression can impact patients.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Aged , Germany , Europe , Qualitative Research
2.
Curr Neuropharmacol ; 22(5): 904-915, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37581323

ABSTRACT

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a stress-related mental disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 20% and, thus, is one of the most prevalent mental health disorders worldwide. Many studies with a large number of patients support the notion that abnormalities of the hypothalamus-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis are crucial for the development of MDD. Therefore, a number of strategies and drugs have been investigated to target different components of the HPA axis: 1) corticotrophinreleasing hormone (CRH) 1 receptor antagonists; 2) vasopressin V1B receptor antagonists, 3) glucocorticoid receptor antagonists, and 4) FKBP5 antagonists. Until now, V1B receptor antagonists and GR antagonists have provided the most promising results. Preclinical data also support antagonists of FKBP5, which seem to be partly responsible for the effects exerted by ketamine. However, as HPA axis alterations occur only in a subset of patients, specific treatment approaches that target only single components of the HPA axis will be effective only in this subset of patients. Companion tests that measure the function of the HPA axis and identify patients with an impaired HPA axis, such as the dexamethasone-corticotrophin-releasing hormone (dex-CRH) test or the molecular dexamethasonesuppression (mDST) test, may match the patient with an effective treatment to enable patient-tailored treatments in terms of a precision medicine approach.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depression , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/metabolism , Pituitary-Adrenal System/metabolism , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/metabolism , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/pharmacology , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/therapeutic use
3.
J Psychiatr Res ; 170: 122-129, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with increased cardiac morbidity. Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) as well as lower interoceptive accuracy (IAc) have been observed in MDD as possible sympathomimetic mechanisms related to insula activity. The salience network (SN) anchored by the insula has been posited as a crucial functional network for cardiac sensations and the default mode network (DMN) for MDD. This study aimed to investigate the relation between insula-centered and depression-related brain networks, IAc and HRV in patients with depression as a possible mechanism by which MDD increases cardiac morbidity. METHODS: 30 depressed inpatients and 30 healthy subjects (derived from the population-based "Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A-B and Determinants of Progression" cohort study, STAAB) all over 50 years were examined. HRV and IAc were assessed via electrocardiogram and a heartbeat perception task prior to a 3 T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Seed-to-voxel resting-state functional connectivity (FC) analysis was conducted with six seeds in the insula and two seeds in the DMN. RESULTS: Depressed patients on the one hand showed decreased FC between insula cortex and frontal as well occipital cortical brain regions compared to controls. Depressed patients on the other hand exhibited higher FC between the medial prefrontal cortex and the insula cortex compared to controls. However, depressed patients did not differ in HRV nor in IAc compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Thus, differences in insula-related brain networks in depression in our study were not mirrored by differences in HRV and IAc. Future research is needed to define the mechanism by which depression increases cardiac morbidity.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Middle Aged , Humans , Aged , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnostic imaging , Heart Rate , Brain Mapping/methods , Cohort Studies , Depression/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Rest/physiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(24)2023 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38138957

ABSTRACT

Anxious depression represents a subtype of major depressive disorder and is associated with increased suicidality, severity, chronicity and lower treatment response. Only a few studies have investigated the differences between anxious depressed (aMDD) and non-anxious depressed (naMDD) patients regarding treatment dosage, serum-concentration and drug-specific treatment response. In our naturalistic and prospective study, we investigated whether the effectiveness of therapy including antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA, tricyclics and combinations) in aMDD patients differs significantly from that in naMDD patients. In a sample of 346 patients, we calculated the anxiety somatization factor (ASF) and defined treatment response as a reduction (≥50%) in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-21 score after 7 weeks of pharmacological treatment. We did not observe an association between therapy response and the baseline ASF-scores, or differences in therapy outcomes between aMDD and naMDD patients. However, non-responders had higher ASF-scores, and at week 7 aMDD patients displayed a worse therapy outcome than naMDD patients. In subgroup analyses for different antidepressant drugs, venlafaxine-treated aMDD patients showed a significantly worse outcome at week 7. Future prospective, randomized-controlled studies should address the question of a worse therapy outcome in aMDD patients for different psychopharmaceuticals individually.


Subject(s)
Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use
5.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 130(5): 707-722, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36959471

ABSTRACT

Depressive patients suffer from a complex of symptoms of varying intensity compromising their mood, emotions, self-concept, neurocognition, and somatic function. Due to a mosaic of aetiologies involved in developing depression, such as somatic, neurobiological, (epi-)genetic factors, or adverse life events, patients often experience recurrent depressive episodes. About 20-30% of these patients develop difficult-to-treat depression. Here, we describe the design of the GEParD (Genetics and Epigenetics of Pharmaco- and Psychotherapy in acute and recurrent Depression) cohort and the DaCFail (Depression-associated Cardiac Failure) case-control protocol. Both protocols intended to investigate the incremental utility of multimodal biomarkers including cardiovascular and (epi-)genetic markers, functional brain and heart imaging when evaluating the response to antidepressive therapy using comprehensive psychometry. From 2012 to 2020, 346 depressed patients (mean age 45 years) were recruited to the prospective, observational GEParD cohort protocol. Between 2016 and 2020, the DaCFail case-control protocol was initiated integrating four study subgroups to focus on heart-brain interactions and stress systems in patients > 50 years with depression and heart failure, respectively. For DaCFail, 120 depressed patients (mean age 60 years, group 1 + 2), of which 115 also completed GEParD, and 95 non-depressed controls (mean age 66 years) were recruited. The latter comprised 47 patients with heart failure (group 3) and 48 healthy subjects (group 4) of a population-based control group derived from the Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A-B and Determinants of Progression (STAAB) cohort study. Our hypothesis-driven, exploratory study design may serve as an exemplary roadmap for a standardized, reproducible investigation of personalized antidepressant therapy in an inpatient setting with focus on heart comorbidities in future multicentre studies.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Heart Failure , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Depression/therapy , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Chronic Disease , Heart Failure/therapy
6.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 55(5): 246-254, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35839823

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacogenetic testing is proposed to minimize adverse effects when considered in combination with pharmacological knowledge of the drug. As yet, limited studies in clinical settings have investigated the predictive value of pharmacokinetic (pk) gene variation on therapeutic drug levels as a probable mechanism of adverse effects, nor considered the combined effect of pk gene variation and drug level on antidepressant treatment response. METHODS: Two depression cohorts were investigated for the relationship between pk gene variation and antidepressant serum concentrations of amitriptyline, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and quetiapine, as well as treatment response. For the analysis, 519 patients (49% females; 46.6±14.1 years) were included. RESULTS: Serum concentration of amitriptyline was associated with CYP2D6 (higher concentrations in poor metabolizers compared to normal metabolizers), of venlafaxine with CYP2C19 (higher concentrations in intermediate metabolizers compared to rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers) and CYP2D6 (lower metabolite-to-parent ratio in poor compared to intermediate and normal metabolizers, and intermediate compared to normal and ultrarapid metabolizers). Pk gene variation did not affect treatment response. DISCUSSION: The present data support previous recommendations to reduce starting doses of amitriptyline and to guide dose-adjustments via therapeutic drug monitoring in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. In addition, we propose including CYP2C19 in routine testing in venlafaxine-treated patients to improve therapy by raising awareness of the risk of low serum concentrations in CYP2C19 rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers. In summary, pk gene variation can predict serum concentrations, and thus the combination of pharmacogenetic testing and therapeutic drug monitoring is a useful tool in a personalized therapy approach for depression.


Subject(s)
Amitriptyline , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use
7.
Brain Commun ; 3(2): fcab020, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33898989

ABSTRACT

Genetic deficiency for acid sphingomyelinase or its pharmacological inhibition has been shown to increase Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell frequencies among CD4+ T cells in mice. We now investigated whether pharmacological targeting of the acid sphingomyelinase, which catalyzes the cleavage of sphingomyelin to ceramide and phosphorylcholine, also allows to manipulate relative CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell frequencies in humans. Pharmacological acid sphingomyelinase inhibition with antidepressants like sertraline, but not those without an inhibitory effect on acid sphingomyelinase activity like citalopram, increased the frequency of Foxp3+ regulatory T cell among human CD4+ T cells in vitro. In an observational prospective clinical study with patients suffering from major depression, we observed that acid sphingomyelinase-inhibiting antidepressants induced a stronger relative increase in the frequency of CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in peripheral blood than acid sphingomyelinase-non- or weakly inhibiting antidepressants. This was particularly true for CD45RA- CD25high effector CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Mechanistically, our data indicate that the positive effect of acid sphingomyelinase inhibition on CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells required CD28 co-stimulation, suggesting that enhanced CD28 co-stimulation was the driver of the observed increase in the frequency of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells among human CD4+ T cells. In summary, the widely induced pharmacological inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase activity in patients leads to an increase in Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell frequencies among CD4+ T cells in humans both in vivo and in vitro.

8.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 46(7): 1307-1314, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637837

ABSTRACT

Depressed patients often do not respond to the first antidepressant prescribed, resulting in sequential trials of different medications. Personalised medicine offers a means of reducing this delay; however, the clinical effectiveness of personalised approaches to antidepressant treatment has not previously been tested. We assessed the clinical effectiveness of using a predictive algorithm, based on behavioural tests of affective cognition and subjective symptoms, to guide antidepressant treatment. We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in 913 medication-free depressed patients. Patients were randomly assigned to have their antidepressant treatment guided by a predictive algorithm or treatment as usual (TaU). The primary outcome was the response of depression symptoms, defined as a 50% or greater reduction in baseline score of the QIDS-SR-16 scale, at week 8. Additional prespecified outcomes included symptoms of anxiety at week 8, and symptoms of depression and functional outcome at weeks 8, 24 and 48. The response rate of depressive symptoms at week 8 in the PReDicT (55.9%) and TaU (51.8%) arms did not differ significantly (odds ratio: 1.18 (95% CI: 0.89-1.56), P = 0.25). However, there was a significantly greater reduction of anxiety in week 8 and a greater improvement in functional outcome at week 24 in the PReDicT arm. Use of the PReDicT test did not increase the rate of response to antidepressant treatment estimated by depressive symptoms but did improve symptoms of anxiety at week 8 and functional outcome at week 24. Our findings indicate that personalisation of antidepressant treatment may improve outcomes in depressed patients.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Primary Health Care , Algorithms , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Humans , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Psychiatr Res ; 135: 294-301, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524676

ABSTRACT

Fear conditioning and generalization are well-known mechanisms in the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders. Extinction of conditioned fear responses is crucial for the psychotherapeutic treatment of these diseases. Anxious depression as a subtype of major depression shares characteristics with anxiety disorders. We therefore aimed to compare fear learning mechanisms in patients with anxious versus non-anxious depression. Fear learning mechanisms in patients with major depression (n = 79; for subgroup analyses n = 41 patients with anxious depression and n = 38 patients with non-anxious depression) were compared to 48 healthy participants. We used a well-established differential fear conditioning paradigm investigating acquisition, generalization, and extinction. Ratings of valence, arousal and probability of expected threat were assessed as well as skin conductance response as an objective psychophysiological measure. Patients with major depression showed impaired acquisition of conditioned fear. In addition, depressed patients showed impaired extinction of conditioned fear responses after successful fear conditioning. Generalization was not affected. However, there was no difference between patients with anxious and non-anxious depression. Results differed between objective and subjective measures. Our findings show altered fear acquisition and extinction in major depression as compared to healthy controls, but they do not favor differential fear learning and extinction mechanisms in the pathogenesis of anxious versus non-anxious depression. The results of impaired extinction warrant future studies addressing extinction learning elements in the treatment of depression.


Subject(s)
Depression , Extinction, Psychological , Anxiety , Fear , Galvanic Skin Response , Humans
10.
Brain Behav Immun ; 93: 132-140, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422640

ABSTRACT

Childhood trauma as well as severe events occurring later in life have been associated with the development of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the interaction of early and later occurring adverse events in patients with MDD is understudied. This study aims to disentangle this interaction by investigating the effects on two of the main stress-response systems of the body, the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA-) axis and the immune system in depressed patients. The function of the HPA-axis was assessed by measuring FKBP5, SGK1 and NR3C1 mRNA-expression in peripheral blood after an in vivo glucocorticoid receptor (GR) challenge with 1.5 mg dexamethasone in 150 depressed in-patients (47.4% females). Childhood trauma was evaluated using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), severe life events occurring one year prior to hospital admission were assessed with the List of Threatening Experiences (LTE). Multiple childhood traumata, i.e. ≥ 3, were present in 68 (45.5%) patients, 59 (39.3%) experienced ≥ 3 severe recent life events. The history of ≥ 3 severe recent life events was associated with an impaired GR-induction of SGK1 (F = 10.455; df = 1; p = 0.002) and FKBP5 mRNA expression (F = 8.720; df = 1; p = 0.004), and with elevated measures of the immune system such as CRP and lymphocyte count. In addition, severe recent life events were associated with a substantially impaired treatment response to antidepressants (F = 7.456; df = 1; p = 0.008). These effects could not be observed in relation to childhood trauma. Severe life events occurring prior to MDD development substantially impaired the stress-response systems and the response to treatment with antidepressants. This finding may indicate the need to employ additional treatment options such as psychotherapy right at the beginning of treatment or immune-modulating approaches.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Immune System , Male , Pituitary-Adrenal System
11.
Neurobiol Stress ; 13: 100271, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33344724

ABSTRACT

Exposure to early life stress can interfere with neurodevelopmental trajectories to increase the vulnerability for psychiatric disorders later in life. With this respect, epigenetic mechanisms play a key role for the long-lasting changes in brain functions that may elicit and sustain psychopathologic outcomes. Here, we investigated DNA methylation changes as possible epigenetic mechanism mediating the effect of prenatal stress (PNS), an experimental paradigm associated with behavioral and molecular alterations relevant for psychiatric disorders. We identified 138 genes as being differentially methylated in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and in the hippocampus (HIP) of male and female adult rats exposed to PNS. Among these genes, miR-30a and Neurod1 emerged as potential players for the negative outcomes associated with PNS exposure. Indeed, in addition to showing consistent methylation differences in both brain regions and in both sexes, and interacting with each other, they are both involved in Axon guidance and Neurotrophin signaling, which are important to neurodevelopmental disorders. We also found a significant reduction in the expression of a panel of genes (CAMK2A, c-JUN, LIMK1, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, PIK3CA and PLCG1) that belong to these two biological pathways and are also validated targets of miR-30a, pointing to a down-regulation of these pathways as a consequence of PNS exposure. Interestingly, we also found that miR-30a levels were significantly upregulated in depressed patients exposed to childhood trauma, as compared to control individuals. Importantly, we also found that a sub-chronic treatment with the atypical antipsychotic drug, lurasidone, during adolescence was able to prevent the up-regulation of miR-30a and normalized the expression of its target genes in response to PNS exposure. Our results demonstrate that miR-30a undergoes epigenetic changes following early life stress exposure and suggest that this miRNA could play a key role in producing broad and long-lasting alterations in neuroplasticity-related pathways, contributing to the etiology of psychiatric disorders.

12.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 175: 55-64, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33008543

ABSTRACT

Stress is associated with the onset of several stress-related mental disorders that occur more frequently in women than in men, such as major depression or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is the major component of the neuroendocrine network responding to internal and external challenges. The proper functioning of the HPA axis is critical for the maintenance of mental and physical health, as dysregulations of the HPA axis have been linked to several mental and physical disorders. Numerous studies have observed distinct sex differences in the regulation of the HPA axis in response to stress, and it is supposed that these differences may partially explain the female predominance in stress-related mental disorders. Preclinical models have clearly shown that the HPA axis in females is activated more rapidly and produces a larger output of stress hormones than in males. However, studies with humans often produced inconsistent findings, which might be traced back to the variation of investigated stressors, the use of contraceptives in some of the studies, and different menstrual cycle stages of the female subjects. This article discusses rodent and human literature of sex differences in the function of the HPA axis.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Female , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System , Male , Pituitary-Adrenal System , Sex Characteristics , Stress, Psychological
13.
J Psychopharmacol ; 34(10): 1105-1111, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32669065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic reference range for venlafaxine in antidepressant treatment has been defined as 100 to 400 ng/mL. However, in an everyday setting active moiety concentrations above the therapeutic reference range were often reported. AIM: The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the therapeutic reference range of venlafaxine. METHODS: In-patients (⩽60 years) with major depressive episodes receiving antidepressant monotherapy with venlafaxine during routine clinical treatment were included in this observational study. Depressive symptom severity was evaluated on a weekly basis using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21), and therapeutic drug monitoring analyses were performed. Resting electrocardiograms were analyzed in week 3, week 5 and week 7 of study participation. RESULTS: Clinical improvement from baseline to week 4 was significantly associated with increasing serum concentrations of the active moiety of venlafaxine (N = 23, Pearson correlation, p = 0.009), but not with the dose of venlafaxine. Patients achieving remission showed significantly higher serum concentrations than patients achieving response/non-response (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.019). Moreover, in patients with serum concentrations above 400 ng/mL time to remission and time to response was significantly shorter than in patients with concentrations below 400 ng/mL (Mantel-COX test, p = 0.001; p = 0.010). QTc time was below the upper limit of a normal QTc time (450 ms) for all patients. CONCLUSION: The serum concentration of the active moiety and not the dose determined the effect of venlafaxine. Shorter remission times without ECG alterations in patients with serum concentrations above the therapeutic reference range suggest a re-evaluation of the therapeutic reference range for venlafaxine in larger studies.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reference Values , Remission Induction/methods , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
14.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 127(11): 1539-1546, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32524199

ABSTRACT

Panic disorder (PD) is one of the most common anxiety disorders and often occurs comorbidly with major depressive disorder (MDD). Altered methylation of the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene has been implicated in the etiology of both PD and MDD. The Krüppel-like factor 11 (KLF11; alias TIEG2), an activating transcription factor of the MAOA gene, has been found to be increased in MDD, but has not yet been investigated in PD. In an effort to further delineate the effects of the KLF11-MAOA pathway in anxiety and affective disorders, KLF11 promoter methylation was analyzed via pyrosequencing of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA isolated from human peripheral blood in two independent samples of PD patients with or without comorbid MDD in a case-control design (sample 1: N = 120) as well as MDD patients with and without anxious depression (sample 2: N = 170). Additionally, in sample 1, KLF11 methylation was correlated with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) scores. No overall association of KLF11 promoter methylation with PD was detected. However, PD patients with comorbid MDD showed significant hypomethylation relative to both healthy controls (p = 0.010) and PD patients without comorbid MDD (p = 0.008). Furthermore, KLF11 methylation was negatively correlated with BDI-II scores in PD patients (p = 0.013). MDD patients without anxious features showed nominally decreased KLF11 methylation in comparison to MDD patients with anxious depression (p = 0.052). The present results suggest KLF11 promoter hypomethylation as a potential epigenetic marker of MDD comorbidity in PD or of non-anxious depression, respectively, possibly constituting a differential pathomechanism in anxiety and mood disorders.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major , Panic Disorder , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Biomarkers , Comorbidity , DNA Methylation , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Factor XI , Humans , Panic Disorder/complications , Panic Disorder/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic
15.
Psychoneuroendocrinology ; 114: 104590, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006918

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A dysregulation in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis function has been repeatedly observed in major depressive disorders (MDD). Normalization of this dysregulation, i.e. of cortisol suppression after glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-stimulation, may be mandatory for clinical remission in some patient subgroups. However, there are no biological measures applied in the clinical setting to identify patient subgroups with HPA axis alterations. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define a suppression index of cortisol concentrations before and after GR stimulation with dexamethasone to predict the variability in improvement of HPA axis activity during antidepressant treatment. METHODS: A modified dexamethasone suppression test (mDST) was performed with blood withdrawal for cortisol and ACTH measurement before and 3 h after 1.5 mg dexamethasone intake at 18:00 in two cohorts of depressed patients treated in a naturalistic setting. The discovery sample consisted of 106 patients, the replication sample of 117 patients. The suppression index was defined as cCORTpreDEXcCORTpostDEX. RESULTS: The baseline suppression index explained 27.4 % of the variance in changes of HPA axis activity before and after treatment with antidepressants. Age, cCORTpreDEXcACTHpreDEX at baseline and sex explained further variance up to 56.2 % (stepwise linear regression, p = 7.8e-8). A threshold of the suppression index at baseline was determined by ROC analysis and revealed, that only patients with a maximum index of 2.32 achieved a normalization of the HPA axis activity after antidepressant treatment. In the replication sample, the threshold was 2.86. However, the estimated suppression index was not associated with treatment response. CONCLUSION: For the first time, by establishing a short-term suppression index of cortisol before and after GR-stimulation a threshold could be identified to predict improvement of HPA axis activity during antidepressant therapy. After replication in further studies this index may help to identify patients who benefit from a specific treatment that targets components of the HPA axis in the future.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Hydrocortisone/blood , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/drug effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adolescent , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Female , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Young Adult
16.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 53(1): 30-35, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30913567

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Infections can alter drug clearance, but the impact of inflammation-induced changes is still not well known. The aim of the investigation was to examine the effect of pathological C-reactive protein (CRP) values (≥0.5 mg/dL) and leukocyte count on the metabolism of 4 different atypical antipsychotics. METHODS: Steady-state serum concentrations of individual patients under therapy with risperidone (n=45), aripiprazole (n=30), olanzapine (n=24), and quetiapine (n=166) were retrospectively analyzed during a period of inflammation by Spearman's Rho correlation analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparison of patients with serum concentrations above and below the upper limit of the therapeutic reference range of each target drug with regard to CRP concentration and leukocyte count. Linear regression analysis was applied to correct for confounding parameters age and sex. RESULTS: Pathological concentrations of CRP were significantly associated with elevated values of C/D of quetiapine (n=166, Spearman's Rho: r=0.269, p<0.001; linear regression: p<0.001). Among patients with quetiapine serum concentrations below 500 ng/mL, CRP concentrations were significantly (p=0.006) lower compared to patients with quetiapine concentrations above 500 ng/mL. A trend for a positive correlation between CRP and serum concentration was found for olanzapine (n=24, Spearman's Rho: r=0.385, p=0.063; linear regression: p=0.086). CONCLUSION: During a period of inflammation in patients taking quetiapine, according to our results, attention in dosing strategies is required to prevent toxic plasma concentrations.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Inflammation/immunology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Aripiprazole/pharmacokinetics , Female , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Olanzapine/pharmacokinetics , Quetiapine Fumarate/pharmacokinetics , Retrospective Studies , Risperidone/pharmacokinetics , Sex Factors , Young Adult
17.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 53(4): 179-183, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31185510

ABSTRACT

Major depressive disorder (MDD) implicates a huge burden for patients and society. Although currently available antidepressants are effective treatment options, more than 50% of the patients do not respond to the first administered antidepressant. In addition, in more than 25% with antidepressants-treated patients, adverse effects occur. Currently, the selection of treatment does not reflect objectively measurable data from neurobiological and behavioral systems. However, in the last decades, the understanding of the impact of genetic variants on clinical features such as drug metabolism has grown and can be used to develop tests that enable a patient-tailored individual treatment. In fact, robust evidence was found that genetic variants of CYP450 enzymes such as CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 can be surrogate markers for the metabolism of certain drugs. This article describes a pilot study design aimed to combine clinical variables such as therapeutic drug monitoring, inflammatory and stress markers with static and variable genetic information of depressed patients to develop an algorithm that predicts treatment response, and tolerability using machine learning algorithms. Psychometric evaluation covers the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, and adverse drug reactions. An in-depth (epi-)genetic assessment combines genome-wide gene association data with DNA methylation patterns of genes coding CYP enzymes along with a pharmacogenetic battery focusing on CYP enzymes. Using these measures to stratify depressed patients, this approach should contribute to a data-driven assessment and management of MDD, which can be referred to as precision medicine or high-definition medicine.


Subject(s)
Genetic Testing/methods , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Pharmacogenomic Testing/methods , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Humans , Pilot Projects , Precision Medicine , Predictive Value of Tests
18.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 76(1): 73-80, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31641787

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Tricyclic antidepressants have been shown to affect electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, but there is limited evidence in relation to the serum concentrations. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a prediction of cardiac risk in amitriptyline- and doxepin-treated patients by serum concentrations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The association between serum concentrations of amitriptyline (n = 100) and doxepin (n = 71) and ECG parameters was retrospectively examined using linear regression analysis. Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to evaluate differences in QTc intervals in patients with serum concentrations above and below the upper limit of the therapeutic reference range, as well as the alert level of each target drug. RESULTS: The sum serum concentration of amitriptyline and the nortriptyline serum concentration were significantly associated with an increased PQ interval (p = 0.020, p = 0.007), as well as with increased QTcB (p = 0.012, p < 0.001) and QTcF intervals (p = 0.025, p < 0.001). The nortriptyline concentration was significantly associated with the QRS interval (p = 0.003). In patients with active moiety concentrations above the alert level (300 ng/ml) and nortriptyline concentrations above the reference range (170 ng/ml), the QTcB interval was significantly prolonged (p = 0.032, p = 0.007). No significant association with any ECG parameter was detected for doxepin serum concentrations. CONCLUSION: The effect of amitriptyline on ECG parameters may be explained by nortriptyline alone. Accordingly, with increasing nortriptyline concentrations, the potential risk for an atrioventricular block, a bundle branch block, and prolongation of QTc interval may increase significantly.


Subject(s)
Amitriptyline/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/adverse effects , Heart Function Tests/drug effects , Nortriptyline/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amitriptyline/blood , Amitriptyline/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Atrioventricular Block/chemically induced , Bundle-Branch Block/chemically induced , Doxepin/adverse effects , Doxepin/analogs & derivatives , Doxepin/blood , Doxepin/therapeutic use , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
19.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 126(12): 1653-1665, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31630255

ABSTRACT

Covariation bias, defined as an overestimation of the relationship between fear-relevant stimuli and aversive consequences, is a well-investigated cognitive bias in anxiety disorders. As patients with affective disorders also show biased information processing, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether depressed patients also display a covariation bias between negative stimuli and aversive consequences. Covariation estimates of 62 inpatients with a current severe depressive episode were assessed at admission (n = 31) or after 6 weeks of treatment (n = 31) and were compared in a between-group design with 31 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All participants showed a covariation bias for the relationship between negative stimuli and aversive consequences. Moreover, covariation bias at admission was significantly associated with various clinician- and self-reported dimensional measures of treatment response assessed 6 weeks later (Global Assessment of Functioning, Clinical Global Impression Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory), i.e., patients with a stronger bias showed greater impairment after 6 weeks of treatment. Categorical analyses revealed that overall, treatment non-responders-but not responders-were characterized by a covariation bias. The naturalistic study design without standardized pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments is a central limitation. We conclude that the covariation bias may constitute a possible marker in the field of emotional information processing in the search for effective predictors of therapy outcome.


Subject(s)
Depression/drug therapy , Depression/psychology , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Emotions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 39(5): 485-488, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31343441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking rates in depressive patients are higher compared with the general population. Smoking was demonstrated to accelerate the metabolism of different drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, but possibly also by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. The principle aim of the present investigation from 2015 to 2018 was to determine the differences in the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram between smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: A group of nonsmokers (n = 88) was compared with smokers (n = 36), both receiving escitalopram, using the Mann-Whitney U test. Linear regression analysis was used to account for the impact of escitalopram dose, age, and sex in addition to smoking on the steady-state serum concentration of escitalopram. RESULTS: Smokers received by mean 17.6% higher doses of escitalopram (P = 0.026) but showed 31.9% lower serum concentrations (P = 0.031). To control for confounders, linear regression analysis showed that dose (P < 0.001), sex (P = 0.03), and smoking tobacco (P = 0.027) did significantly influence serum concentrations of escitalopram with higher levels in women and nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding higher daily doses, smokers had significantly lower serum concentrations of escitalopram. In concordance with previous results, besides CYP1A2, a possible induction of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by tobacco smoke, resulting in lower serum concentrations of escitalopram in smokers than in nonsmokers, is suggested. Therefore, to provide personalized therapy, clinicians should consider smoking status and inform patients on the interactions of smoking and escitalopram metabolism.


Subject(s)
Citalopram/administration & dosage , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Tobacco Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Citalopram/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/metabolism , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/metabolism , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Smokers , Tobacco Smoking/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...